The Hungry Years Essays - Systemic Risk, World Economy,

The Hungry Years Book Report Paradis, Adrian A. The Hungry Years. Philadelphia. 1967. There were few changes that could be seen; for the most part the revolution was quiet. Never before had so many people of the United States held in their hearts despair, panic and want. Yet out of the fear of the Depression came social reforms that have strengthened America and its people. The Depression was the worst economic decline ever in the United States history that spread to practically all of the industrialized world. It began in late 1929 and lasted for about ten years. There were many factors that played a role in causing the depression, but the main cause was the unequal distribution of wealth during the 1920's, and the wide stock market speculation that happened toward the end of the 1920's. These factors, along with others, caused the American economy to turn upside-down. The ?roaring twenties? was a time that the United States prospered greatly. The nation's total income rose from $74.3 billion in 1923 to $89 billion in 1929. However, the benefits of the prosperity of the 1920's were not shared evenly among all Americans, and the maldistribution of income between the rich and the middle class grew throughout the decade. Two major reasons for the gap between the rich and the working class were the increased manufacturing output throughout this period and because the federal government favored business, which included the wealthy who put their money into these businesses. The growing gap between the wealthy and the middle class made the United States economy unstable. For the economy to function properly, total demand must equal total supply. In an economy with such an unequal distribution of income, it wasn't always likely that the demand would always equal the supply. Basically what happened in the 1920's was that there was an oversupply of goods. It was not that the products were not wanted, but that those who needed the products, simply could not afford more; whereas, the wealthy's needs were met by spending only a little amount of their income. Unfortunately, the gap between the two only began to grow wider. In contributing to the Depression, the federal government favored the new industries instead of agriculture. During World War I, the federal government had subsidized farms, and paid very high prices for wheat and other grains. The government had encouraged farmers to buy more land and to update their farming methods with the new technology, and to produce more food. However, when the war ended, the United States stopped its policies to help farmers. Farmers then fell into debt and the farm prices and food prices dropped. To make a long story short, farmers were left out in the cold by the government. One other reason for the instability of the American economy was the international wealth distribution problems. While American was prospering in the 1920's, European nations were trying to rebuild after the damage from the war. During World War I, the United States government lent European allies $7 billion, and another $3.3 billion by 1920. Of these and other funds, 90% were used to purchase U.S. goods. When the United States lent money to the nations in need, they expected to be reimbursed, but the nations were in no position to pay off the debts. Now the depression began to set in. Prices had been drifting downward, but on October 21 prices started falling quickly. Prices stabilized a little on Tuesday and Wednesday, but then on Black Thursday, October 24, everything fell apart again. Partial recovery was made on Friday and Saturday. Then on Black Tuesday, stocks fell so much that at many times no buyers were available at any price. The resulting stock market crash acted as a trigger to the unstable United States economy. Because of the halt of purchases of the industrial production, it also crashed, putting many people without jobs. To protect America's businesses, the United States made higher trade barriers. Foreigners stopped buying Americans products. More jobs were lost, more stores were closed, more banks went under, and more factories closed. the country had then entered catastrophe--The Great Depression. This book was very interesting and it gave great insight on the The Hungry Years Essays - Systemic Risk, World Economy, The Hungry Years Book Report Paradis, Adrian A. The Hungry Years. Philadelphia. 1967. There were few changes that could be seen; for the most part the revolution was quiet. Never before had so many people of the United States held in their hearts despair, panic and want. Yet out of the fear of the Depression came social reforms that have strengthened America and its people. The Depression was the worst economic decline ever in the United States history that spread to practically all of the industrialized world. It began in late 1929 and lasted for about ten years. There were many factors that played a role in causing the depression, but the main cause was the unequal distribution of wealth during the 1920's, and the wide stock market speculation that happened toward the end of the 1920's. These factors, along with others, caused the American economy to turn upside-down. The ?roaring twenties? was a time that the United States prospered greatly. The nation's total income rose from $74.3 billion in 1923 to $89 billion in 1929. However, the benefits of the prosperity of the 1920's were not shared evenly among all Americans, and the maldistribution of income between the rich and the middle class grew throughout the decade. Two major reasons for the gap between the rich and the working class were the increased manufacturing output throughout this period and because the federal government favored business, which included the wealthy who put their money into these businesses. The growing gap between the wealthy and the middle class made the United States economy unstable. For the economy to function properly, total demand must equal total supply. In an economy with such an unequal distribution of income, it wasn't always likely that the demand would always equal the supply. Basically what happened in the 1920's was that there was an oversupply of goods. It was not that the products were not wanted, but that those who needed the products, simply could not afford more; whereas, the wealthy's needs were met by spending only a little amount of their income. Unfortunately, the gap between the two only began to grow wider. In contributing to the Depression, the federal government favored the new industries instead of agriculture. During World War I, the federal government had subsidized farms, and paid very high prices for wheat and other grains. The government had encouraged farmers to buy more land and to update their farming methods with the new technology, and to produce more food. However, when the war ended, the United States stopped its policies to help farmers. Farmers then fell into debt and the farm prices and food prices dropped. To make a long story short, farmers were left out in the cold by the government. One other reason for the instability of the American economy was the international wealth distribution problems. While American was prospering in the 1920's, European nations were trying to rebuild after the damage from the war. During World War I, the United States government lent European allies $7 billion, and another $3.3 billion by 1920. Of these and other funds, 90% were used to purchase U.S. goods. When the United States lent money to the nations in need, they expected to be reimbursed, but the nations were in no position to pay off the debts. Now the depression began to set in. Prices had been drifting downward, but on October 21 prices started falling quickly. Prices stabilized a little on Tuesday and Wednesday, but then on Black Thursday, October 24, everything fell apart again. Partial recovery was made on Friday and Saturday. Then on Black Tuesday, stocks fell so much that at many times no buyers were available at any price. The resulting stock market crash acted as a trigger to the unstable United States economy. Because of the halt of purchases of the industrial production, it also crashed, putting many people without jobs. To protect America's businesses, the United States made higher trade barriers. Foreigners stopped buying Americans products. More jobs were lost, more stores were closed, more banks went under, and more factories closed. the country had then entered catastrophe--The Great Depression. This book was very interesting and it gave great insight on the

Marketing channels

Marketing channels Marketing channels refer to all actions taken in transferring ownership of properties usually from the manufacturer through the distributor and to the final user. Marketing channels may be as short as involving the wholesaler and the consumer or may be very long involving a number of intermediaries such as vendors, retailers, distributors and off course the final user (Zahorsky, 2010, p. 1). A high number of marketing channels leads to a higher end cost to the final user because all the intermediaries involved have to be paid.Advertising We will write a custom report sample on Marketing channels specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The most important aspect of intermediaries is the creation of time and place where products are always availed on time within the final customers’ reach. Most organizations use marketing channels to create a connection between production and consumption which does not only involve delivery of goods but many other aspects of transactions (Berry, 1996, p. 1). Marketing intermediaries provides customers with information concerning the products. Distributors and retailers may conduct research on products from their production companies and make it available to customers. Most organizations use intermediate channels to promote their products mainly through offers with the most used channel for promotion being retailer shops. Business organizations can only contact their consumers through intermediaries especially the wholesalers and retailers who have direct contacts with the producers and the consumers (Keneth, 2010, p. 1). This way, consumers’ response towards certain products can be evaluated. Marketing channels are used to make negotiations for organizations on prizes and other terms of sales and promotions. All intermediate channels physically transport and store goods for the production companies as the goods move towards the final users. Production companies do not suffer the cost of the distribution channels because it is paid for by the consumers (Hughes, 2008, p. 1). Physical distribution This describes all the actual activities involved from the final production of products up to the end users. These activities occur within the distribution channels involved be it through wholesalers or retailers. Physical distribution involves a number of activities which are all aimed at offering quality products to consumers as well as transporting goods efficiently (McManus, 2008, p. 1). These components include: Customer service where business owners provide services for quality customer satisfaction. For instance, a wholesaler selling computers may offer to deliver the goods to the customer’s door steps within 48 hours after ordering. It is therefore the duty of the physical distribution system in that wholesale to ensure that good once ordered are delivered to the customer within the shortest time as well as the lowest cost possible (Smith, 2010, p . 1). Transportation methods are very essential in physical distribution because it involves a lot of movement of goods all the way from the producers to the final consumers. The major modes of moving goods by many businesses are air, water, rail and road. Air transportation is the most efficient where goods involved are perishable and have to be moved over long distances. However, this mode is quite expensive especially for small businesses. Many businesses are turning to water transport because it is cost effective however it is very slow therefore it can only transport the non perishable goods.Advertising Looking for report on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More An efficient mode is rail due to its ability to transport bulky goods over long distances and it does not pollute the environment. Its only disadvantage is that it is not flexible. Many small businesses prefer road transport which is advan tageous in door to door delivery and flexibility. This is the most used mode of transportation in physical distribution by many business marketers (William, 2008, p. 1). Planning and controlling of marketing activities Effective control of marketing activities is vital in achieving both organizational functions and marketing targets. The organizational form of marketing evaluation and control involves establishing standards on marketing performance, evaluating the actual marketing performance and taking corrective measures where necessary. Planning and controlling are always related because the plan states the aim of any business activity or what is expected to be accomplished (Miguel, 1988, p. 1). A performance standard should be set on all marketing activities to enable the business organization evaluate the performance by comparing the standards to the real performance. Performance standards may include: increase in new customers or reductions in sale of faulty products which lea ds to customer complaints. Managers should always relate the performance standards to the organizations goals and objectives (McHenry, 2010, p. 1). After the marketing activities are through, managers the compare the standards they had set with the actual marketing activities that have been performed. The marketing managers then determine whether the marketing objectives have been met or if there has been a variance between the performance and the set standards. If a variation has occurred then the managers evaluate the variance from which they can take control measures over the issue. There are several ways in which marketing managers can control the variance in case of failure to meet the marketing standards. They may find ways of improving the real marketing activities or change the marketing standards. In improving the actual market performance, many managers use motivational methods on the marketing personnel or better yet effectively coordinate the marketing activities (Glenno n, 2010, p. 1). For best results, most marketing managers use both methods to correct marketing activities. Bibliography Berry, T. (1996). Channel marketing moves goods from producers to consumers. Available from, http://articles.mplans.com/channel-marketing-moves-goods-from-producers-to-consumers/ Glennon, p. (2010). Place- the 3rd p of Marketing mix. Available from, http://free-books-online.org/management/principles-of-marketing/place-the-3rd-p-of-marketing-mix/ Advertising We will write a custom report sample on Marketing channels specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Hughes, R. (2008). Why marketing intermediaries are used by most organizations. Available from, https://books.google.com/books?id=-R1zRakeLJgCpg=PA415lpg=PA415dq=why+marketing+intermediaries+are+used+by+most+organizations.%22source=blots=de57b9KtXzsig=Zom0CKjSHJz3WmEy2T9Y7VnDwgchl=enei=3bs6TbSFF9Po4gbu_5nuCgsa=Xoi=book_resultct=resultresnum=10ved=0CFMQ6AEwCQ#v=onepageq=w hy%20marketing%20intermediaries%20are%20used%20by%20most%20organizations.%22f=false Keneth, F. (2010) what Are The Functions of Marketing Intermediaries? Available from, http://ezinearticles.com/?What-Are-The-Functions-of-Marketing-Intermediaries?id=5422617 McHenry, W. (2010). Evaluation and Control – Marketing Management. Available from, docstoc.com/docs/25969095/Evaluation-and-ControlMarketing-Management McManus, W. (2008). Logistics and Physical Distribution. Available from, foodexportalliance.org/eweb/DynamicPage.aspx?Site=miatcoWebKey=0547cac9-ece2-4391-9832-0e20cfbf2064 Miguel, M. (1988). Marketing Information systems. Available from, fao.org/docrep/w3241e/w3241e0a.htm Smith, R. (2010). International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management. Available from, emeraldinsight.com/products/journals/journals.htm?id=ijpdlm William, M. (2008). Understanding Business. Available from, http://highered.mcgraw-hill.com/sites/007310597x/student_view0/chapter15/ chapter_summary.html Advertising Looking for report on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Zahorsky, D. (2010). Tuning In to Your Customer’s Marketing Channels. Available from, http://sbinformation.about.com/od/marketplansample/a/marketing-mix.htm

Criticaly review the popular opinion of prison life with those who Literature

Criticaly the popular opinion of prison life with those who have been imprisoned in the UK (subject criminology) - Literature review Example This theory also emphasises the importance of victims and offenders meeting each other face to face, allowing them to voice their issues and experiences in order to eventually achieve mutually supported resolutions. Restorative justice is based on various indigenous cultures, cultures which apply traditions relating to spirituality and holistic healing (Sharpe, 1998). It also uses the non-retributive obligations relating to harm, supported by other faiths and cultures. In general therefore, penology based on this theory seeks to secure a balance between the offender and offended party (Cavadino and Dignan, 2006). Restorative justice therefore includes the concept of punishment. Penology designs by society include imprisonment, the payment of fines, and corporal punishment as a means of achieving the principles of restorative justice. Within the concept of restorative justice therefore, the perceptions of society and of incarcerated individuals shall be anchored, especially in terms o f the actual impact of incarceration on prisoners. (link between restorative justice and punishment) In understanding restorative justice, however, it is important to understand the criminal justice system and its initial applications in the UK society. Penal policy in the UK went through various transitions in an effort to support the Church of England against nonconformists, mostly by implementing forfeitures, civil provisions, and civil disabilities (Morrill, 1996). From the nineteenth century, significant changes have been identified in the criminal justice system. During Queen Victoria’s reign, major theorists like Edwin Chadwick considered the criminal offender as individuals belonging to the working classes who did not want to enter an honest full day’s work, and who preferred to drink and be idle (Mantle, et.al., 2005). The mid-19th century welcomed the term

BUS599 MoD 1 SLP Assign Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

BUS599 MoD 1 SLP Assign - Essay Example ents are quite sensitive to its prices, but do not mind on issues ascribed to its performance; clients do not mind any variation caused on its performance, but mind its prices and clients prices as well as the performance of X7 is given equal priorities by its clients. This research will focus on an analysis of the financial years of the three products, basically taking into consideration; pricing, marketing strategies and allocation of resources thus creating an effective platform for development of appropriate operational strategies for the financial year 2016. Financial Year 2012: The respective prices of tablets X5, 6 and 7 during this financial year was; 285, 430 and 190 dollars. The products also experienced variations in cost allocation at rate of 34% for X5 and 33% each for X6 and X7. In summation, the company made sales amounting to 1,055,294,574 dollars after selling 3,102,177 units. The R&D, fixed and variable costs exhibited a sum of 784, 720, 740 dollars. The profit margins during this year was at 270, 573, 835 dollars, indicating a 26% increase of the total yearly revenue. Taking into consideration the profits accrued in 2011, the 2012 profit margin indicated a 10% increase. In relation to individual product market performance, product X5 sold more units as compared to product X6 and X7 by registering sales amounting to 1,647,592 units: This generated annual revenue of 469,563, 809 dollars with a product profit of $139, 504, 962, generating 30% of the overall annual revenue of the product. The product X7 indicated the lowest sa les during this year, after exhibiting sales amounting to 165, 586 units leading to reduced profit of 27% less as compared to the previous year, which was at 0%. Generally, the annual revenue generated from the three products during this year indicated an upward trend, despite the fact that product X 7 indicated decreased profit margins. Financial Year 2013: The Clipboard Tablet Company designated prices of the three products

Organic Food vs. Non Organic Food Essay Example for Free

Organic Food vs. Non Organic Food Essay In today’s society you walk into a grocery store and you always have the option of organic or non organic food. There are even grocery stores dedicated to organic foods like Trader Joe’s, Sprouts and Whole Food market. I personally have gone organic and will never go back to eating or drinking non organic food. Organic food may be pricey but less hormones, less cow puss and blood in your milk, and less pesticides. The controversies about organic food vs non organic food is it worth it? My answer is 100 percent yes organic is the way to go. The fruits and vegetables you get at a normal grocery store that are non organic have several pesticides on it. According to the daily green, ‘ eating organic means avoiding the pesticide residue left on foods. † Though there are mixed reviews on if consuming pesticides hurt your immune system, pregnant women are taking the cautionary steps on making sure their future child will be born healthy and not be exposed to pesticides at an early age. On the Dirty Dozen list, apples are the number 1 food source of 2011, with over 40 known pesticides in just 1 apple. Not surprisingly, pesticide residue is also found in apple juice and apple sauce, making all apple products smart foods to buy organic. Strawberries have over 60 pesticides on it, so while you â€Å"wash† your strawberries remember you are eating pesticide residue remains on those strawberries you bought at the food market. 93% of Americans tested by the CDC had metabolites of chlorpyrifos a nuerotoxic insecticide in their urine. Banned from home use because of its risks to children, chlorpyrifos is part of a family of pesticides (organophosphates) linked to ADHD. Women who were exposed to DDT as girls are 5 times more likely to develop breast cancer, according to Panna. Several people are allergic to the growth hormone farmers put in their animals, but are able to eat organic meats because animals raised organically are not allowed to be fed antibiotics, the bovine human growth hormone (rbGH), or other artificial drugs. Animals are also not allowed to eat genetically modified foods. Organic meat the animals are also killed more humane than non organic animals. The animals are raised in a healthier environment, fed organic feed, and often eat a wider range of nutrients than those raised in factory farms (such as would be the case of free-range chickens and ranch cattle). Cbn. com stated, â€Å"In a recent poll, two-thirds of Americans surveyed stated they would like to be able to fit organic foods into their budgets. † Organic food may cost more but less exposure to unnecessary hormones and pesticides is worth it. Organic is the way to go, lower pesticide levels, more nutrients, no antibiotics, no added growth hormones, and environmental responsibility. Although research findings about benefits of organic produce are not conclusive, it is definite that organic stuff is safer than the produce with traces of pesticides. Organic milk, vegetables and fruits are much more expensive than the non-organic but if you can afford it then go for it. If more people start buying organic food then gradually their prices will gradually come down.

The Media Coverage Of Womens Sport In Australia Media Essay

The Media Coverage Of Womens Sport In Australia Media Essay In past centuries, women were discouraged from participating in any physical activity. Women were seen as having inadequate strength and ability to perform any physical activity instead were expected to be submissive and obedient supporters of their male relatives in this one sex activity. In the contemporary world, women have the rights to participate in different sports, and are acknowledged for their expertise to a degree; however, it is obvious that mens sport is still dominant. It is evident in nearly all societies that men were and still are receiving the majority of the media coverage, and are more recognised and rewarded for their athletic efforts. When images are presented in the media for sport, they are often of muscular men who have achieved excellence in their sport. At a young age, children are influenced to follow the stereotypes created through the years. Young girls are often excluded in school sports and pressured to express themselves as more passive and beautiful beings. As a result, young boys are given higher opportunities in sport and are rewarded for such things as getting dirty in a game of football and tackling players is rugby. As George Orwell said, Sport is war without bullets. Sometimes the language of sport borrows the language of war: we hear about battles, warriors, and some very real-life injuries. By comparing sport to past events such as war, where women were subjected to roles that only supported men as they were seen as weak, feminine and vulnerable, it is clear that the media is encouraging this disempowerment. While girls are increasingly encouraged to participate in sport, they are brought up believing that they are much weaker than boys, and cannot perform at the same level or intensity. Boys that do not fit the male stereotype norm in sports are often portrayed as having feminised gender characteristics. A young boy to be told that he throws like a girl or runs like a girl is considered an insult to normalised masculinity. Sport and masculinity are closely entwined, and as a result femininity has been defined as the other and distanced from sport. Men who enter the industry in traditionally female sports such as gymnastics, dance and diving are stereotyped as performing in a more feminine domain. Women in Australia have become largely involved in a majority of sports and sporting events including the Olympics and the Commonwealth games. Over 40 percent of the total participants in the Athens Olympic Games in 2004 were women, and Australia had one of the largest contributions to this percentage. However, their achievements are less acknowledged as those of men, through receiving less media coverage on TV and in the print media, newspapers and magazines. Womens sport receives a total of 9% of all sports coverage in all Australian television news and current affairs (Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, 2010). On the other hand, male sport receives over 80%. This unequal coverage has unfortunately created a difficult situation for sportswomen. Women are given less opportunities for professionalism and their media representation commonly portrays them as sexualised and feminine. Unfortunately the limited numbers of women in management within the industry means that changing this disempowerment is a difficult issue for women. The minimal coverage describes women in ways that stress feminine beauty, weakness, passivity and insignificance, deflecting attention from their athleticism. As women are not seen as equally skilful nor worthy of this media coverage, women find it vital to have a strong focus on their appearance to attract the attention of viewers. In a majority of womens sports, the outfits worn by female athletes are minimal and tight, and hair and makeup is flawless which portrays women as glamorous rather than skilful. Womens sport in Australia sees the Opals in basketball wearing tight fitting bodysuits in contrast to the mens knee length oversized shorts and baggy jerseys and women in beach volleyball wearing skimpy bathers while men play in shorts. This image attracts the wrong attention from viewers and even though the number of viewers (usually men) may increase due to this, women are stereotyped and their true abilities are made insignificant. Women are forced to contest each other to find ways to attract coverage to grow their profile and draw much-needed sponsorship dollars. After attracting sponsorship women are pressured by their sponsors to continue to emphasise femininity and look glamorous and beautiful, in order to be successful. Martina Navratilova is one athlete that never followed the stereotype, and relied on her athletic skills in order to be successful. Todays women tennis stars are good athletes who shouldnt have to wear dresses with plunging necklines to grab headlines (Navratilova, M 2000) On the other hand, Tennis superstar Anna Kournikova, has never won a professional tennis tournament, yet is one of the most famous women athletes. She relies on her looks and chooses to promote herself sexually, generally in mens magazine. The courts are as a stage, people love to see attractive players. Yes it is true I always try to be as seductive as possible but I wouldnt be here if I couldnt play tennis (Kournikova, A 2010). Majority of women athletes understand that to be entirely successful, they must have to follow the stereotype and have a strong feminine look to attract viewers. The language used by the media to describe women athletes subjects them to downgrading and sexist language. Women are often described using words such as vulnerable, choking and defeated while male athletes are given empowerment through the language used to describe them. The majority of descriptions of men include words such strong, powerful and gutsy giving them confidence to perform. Commentators and writers in the media push this disempowerment by not only using this language, but by relating women to children and treating them as amateur, unprofessional athletes through using their first names only. Lack of sponsorship hampers the growth and professionalism of womens sports. As the women are unable to obtain substantial sponsorship, they are unable to receive an increase of media coverage and vice versa, therefore the situation is difficult to overcome. The Australian Bodyboarding Pro Tour has been around as a contest for men to express their surfing abilities. For women, this contest has only been available for a few years, with most girls funding their own participation and travel expenses. Out of over 20 women entrants from Australia, only 4 received sponsorship. For women to be able to continue to perform like men, and grow in professionalism, they need to acquire funds like men do. The minimal of coverage is limiting the sponsorship opportunities therefore restricting career and training opportunities. Earning a minimal income from their competitions makes women unable to balance a professional sporting career and a family life. Without sponsorship, or a high winning income, women are forced to also work for a living in order to support their sport, and their family lives. Their busy schedules mean their hours to daily exercise and training are limited, which affects their chances of performing at their best ability. It was once thought that perhaps male athletes were more powerful athletes and therefore deserving of a higher salary. Society believed that the athletes performed at a harder and more exciting standard and for longer periods of time. However, this fact is entirely false and majority of sports are played, and at the same standard, by both men and women. Kira Llewellyn, who surfs for a living, is usually paid between $1000 and $5000 for her competition winnings. She received $20,000 US prize for the Sintra Pro in Portugal which was the largest sum for a woman in this contest. However, this prize money is not acceptable when the male winner received double the amount. Society has minimal understanding and knowledge of the sports due to the restricted coverage. Shelley Maher, president of Womens Lacrosse Australia said Australia is number one in the world in womens lacrosse and yet a very small percentage of the population would know about our sport, let alone that we were champions. Women strive hard to accomplish their goals in their sport. Sadly though, the lack of coverage means they are not credited for those achievements. Its not fair that a tennis player, for example, gets a half page article for breaking into the world top ten and we have the best in the world right here under our noses and nobody outside the sport seems to care, body boarding enthusiast Amanda Dahl says. In fact, the sportswomen from Australia in the 2006 Commonwealth Games won more gold and silver medals than men. Consistent media coverage can benefit a sport by creating positive role models for societys younger generations. These roles models sadly are limited in the world today because of this minimal coverage. Roles models are needed in contemporary Australia to help girls to set goals and accomplish their dreams. Once children reach adolescence, participation in physical activity declines immensely. Having role models in the media, allows the children see that women athletes do exist and therefore these children will begin to see athleticism as an important part in the female identity. The media needs to show a diversity of models, some with a strong athletic ability to ensure, to ensure that the younger generation is able to break through the construction on feminity. In conclusion, women have always been seen as the second sex when it comes to sport. Even though it is evident that coverage has increase over the years, it is clearly still a major disempowerment. Womens sport needs to be given equal coverage as men and needs to focus on their talents rather than the stereotypical images of women such as beautiful and sexualised. This will help create a standard for Australia that both women and men are equal beings, and will be expressed to the world through their media coverages. These factors as above need to be addressed to allow women to succeed in the sporting industry. Being given equal income, and not making women sexualised will create role models for the younger generations and will allow the industry to grow positively. Providing more physical education for girls in school based institutions will encourage young girls to continue exercise and understand it is achievable to perform at an elite level. As Kate Ellis, the Federal Minister for Sport stated, In a country with such a rich sporting culture as Australia, where womens sport is competitive and very successful on the international stage, it is incredibly disappointing that female sport remains so starkly under-represented in the media.

Living constitution

For the past two decades, those in favor of original intent/strict contructionism have been gaining some influence over those who favor a â€Å"living constitution† interpretation of the Constitution. This seems to correlate with the rise of conservative influence over America in the past two decades.   In response to the liberal activism in what was called the Warren Court, conservatives started to voice what was called the conservative critique. Most visibly, this consisted of President Reagan’s attorney general, Edwin Meese was â€Å"unhappy with many of the Supreme Courts liberal decisions of the preceding decades, Meese argued that it was meddling with the affairs of the other federal branches and especially the state governments. (TDD 387).† In response to Meese’s complaint on judicial activism, Supreme Court Justice William Brennan Jr., argued in defense of the judicial activism in what we think is the correct and most favorable interpretation on the Constitution. Brennan puts forth many arguments in favor of what some call a â€Å"Living Constitution† view of the Supreme Courts role in judicial review. Brennan first criticizes what those who favor Original Intent call â€Å"the intention of the Framers† in relation to how judicial review should be carried out. Brennan attacks this doctrine by saying, â€Å"It is arrogant to pretend that from our vantage we can gauge accurately the intent of the Framers on application of principle to specific, contemporary questions†¦the Framers themselves did not agree about the application or meaning of particular constitutional provisions, and hide their differences in cloaks of generality (DEB 325).† This asserts that because the Framers themselves didn’t agree, it would be impossible to judge what the Framers intent would be, as there is no pure consensus on certain constitutional provisions leaving the document incomplete and ambiguous. To view the strict constructionist versus Living Constitution in the right context, one must see who the people are behind these terms. The people who promote a strict constructionist view are almost exclusively economic and social conservatives. This isn’t a coincidence as it is clear to see that many of the major Supreme Court cases of the past century have sided with a economically and socially liberal view. This suggests that conservatives wouldn’t be against judicial activism if the courts ruled in their favor, for instance what if the Supreme Court all of the sudden ruled against legal abortion, banned gun laws, and got rid of welfare? If this happened the very same people who were once strict constructionist and anti-judicial activism would convert to a pro-judicial activist view, and vice versa with liberals. Which leads me to profess that I only prescribe to pro-judicial activism philosophy because they have made â€Å"liberal† decisions in the past. Brennan of course gives other reasons for a Living Constitution other than the fact that the court has made liberal decisions. He argues that a Living Constitution serves as a check against unconstitutional and poor majoritarian rule by the legislature. Brennan reports that an â€Å"Unabashed enshrinement of majority would permit the imposition of a social caste system or wholesale confiscation of property so long as a majority of the authorized legislative body, fairly elected, approved (Brennan 326).† This of course relies on the values and perhaps the consciences on the judges, who don’t have to play the partison politics games thanks to the lifetime term they can serve but still are put in their positions by elected officials. So if a corrupt and authoritarian elected legistlaative majority can get enough judges they approve of to Supreme Court seats, the legislative check disappears,